Denver has always had crazy weather!Now it seems there are 65º "Winter" days down here
Winter will come, and we will be fine.
OK. Full disclosure: I admit be being more than a little worried about where all of this is heading.
Denver has always had crazy weather!Now it seems there are 65º "Winter" days down here
Hmmm.For not-studded, I chose the Michelin X-ice over Hakkapelittas on our two vehicles that spend more time in Denver. I'd do the same again. My dad just bought a set of X-ice yesterday on my recommendation.
Also, the Hakkapeliitta 7 SUV is an older model. I believe they have a Hakkapelitta 9 SUV out now. The X-ice 3 is Michelin's latest model for the same price. The technology in each generation gets better. I'm not sure if there is a direct comparison anywhere, but I'd bet the X-ice 3 will outperform the Hakka 7 SUV (without studs).
I think the X-Ice 3 will probably drive much better in the dry as well. My Hakkapeliitta 7 SUV (studded) feel more like a truck/SUV tire, as you'd expect. On an Outback, I'd prefer the more car-oriented performance of the X-ice 3. On my G35 they drive surprisingly nicely.
How do they perform on I-70 when the snow comes down hard and the big rigs compress the snow into ice in a hurry. (Thinking eastbound Vail Pass).For not-studded, I chose the Michelin X-ice over Hakkapelittas on our two vehicles that spend more time in Denver. I'd do the same again. My dad just bought a set of X-ice yesterday on my recommendation.
Also, the Hakkapeliitta 7 SUV is an older model. I believe they have a Hakkapelitta 9 SUV out now. The X-ice 3 is Michelin's latest model for the same price. The technology in each generation gets better. I'm not sure if there is a direct comparison anywhere, but I'd bet the X-ice 3 will outperform the Hakka 7 SUV (without studs).
I think the X-Ice 3 will probably drive much better in the dry as well. My Hakkapeliitta 7 SUV (studded) feel more like a truck/SUV tire, as you'd expect. On an Outback, I'd prefer the more car-oriented performance of the X-ice 3. On my G35 they drive surprisingly nicely.
The manager at the Ralston Road store suggested that the Hakka 7 would be a better fit for the Outback, opining that the R2 was better suited to light trucks or full size SUVs.I haven't tried the Hakka 7 without studs, but it's pretty good with studs (drove a Jeep Patriot with them for work).
I have one winter and a couple of weeks with the Hakkapeliitta R2 on my Mazda 3, and a few years with X-ice III on two other vehicles (Toyota Corrola and Pontiac Wave). Even allowing for vehicle differences I would rate the Hakkapeliitta easily a better performer than the X-ice in every thing but longevity; the X-ice seem to wear better than the Hakka R2, but the Hakka R2 does much better in snow and slush and a bit better on ice.
How do they perform on I-70 when the snow comes down hard and the big rigs compress the snow into ice in a hurry. (Thinking eastbound Vail Pass).
Latest CR winter tire ratings:
Those are just the top bunch that fit on my screen.
He didn't have trunk space for tire number 5. Apparently since the car comes with run flats, they take the spare tire compartment out. Which sucks.Why not just buy five snow tires and forgetabout the run flats?
Thanks for the input. It really sounds like the Michelin would be a great choice for the Outback. Most of the miles will be weekly round trips from Golden to Vail - often leaving late in the afternoon or early morning, when the roads can quickly turn icy. Vail Pass is nothing to mess with.On anything packed or icy the X-ice is absolutely fantastic. As @nay would point out, slushy conditions are where they would benefit from a more open tread. That's the performance trade-off. They still do great in slush, just not as good as the more open treads on my Hakka 7 SUV. Very different vehicles, of course.
Ralston road! That's where my dad bought his tires (and where I went to HS!). I had many a lunch at that DQ. Can't believe Tams gone :-(
He didn't have trunk space for tire number 5. Apparently since the car comes with run flats, they take the spare tire compartment out. Which sucks.
Can you tell me where Perilli Winter Sottozero 3 is on the list? I'm between those and the Continental WinterContact tire. Perilli is about $100 more from my dealer in the Run Flats.
Can you tell me where Perilli Winter Sottozero 3 is on the list? Perilli is about $100 more from my dealer in the Run Flats.
CR didn't test that tire. Below is the only Perilli tested (didn't do great) vs. the tested Michelin, Nokian, and Bridgestones.
Or, maybe an option is to forgo the run-flats and get an AAA membership that gives you 100 miles of towing:
http://www.aaa.com/aaa/006/membership_Types_Join.html